Many long-time genealogy researchers tend to find just about everything interesting. A common comment for being more efficient with research time is the need to limit what I call “Shiny Object Syndrome” – the fascination with anything interesting that is wandering into the research view – and what many other researchers call something such as “following rabbit trails.” While this is certainly important when one is researching for someone else or researching at a repository for a very limited amount of time, sometimes following the path wherever it leads can be beneficial.
Chipmunks, a Northeastern North American mammal that burrows in the ground, are fascinating creatures. They usually have at least three entrances/exits to their tunnels so that they can come in or out at will, escaping predators and other chipmunks. They also typically have multiple food stores in their tunnels, because chipmunks have a propensity to raid each others’ food stores, and this way, their entire cache of food won’t be wiped out in a single raid.
What on earth, you are likely thinking, does any of this have to do with genealogy? I posit a somewhat offbeat idea – that sometimes going down the chipmunk tunnel will lead you to a cache.
For some days, I had a piece of mail almost ready to go, waiting to be sent to a vital records department. Like some other vital records repositories, this one requires a money order to process, so I hadn’t taken the final step of getting one. When I have to take an extra step like that, I like to pool my order if I can. Since this couple had gotten married in a particular town, and I believe they likely did so because a sibling lived there at the time, I wanted to try one more time to find some indication of where the sibling’s marriage took place before sending the letter in, so that I could request both records at once if it turned out to be in the same locale.
I started by searching for an obituary of the husband. I knew his death date from family papers that had been passed down to me, and had previously confirmed the place and date with an online index, but had not looked for an obituary nor ordered the original record yet. (I had previously searched multiple times for an obituary of the wife, who outlived him by 34 years, but had never found one.) I found a death notice in a newspaper, and then found a full-page article about his life and death in a trade magazine on Google Books. The article went into great detail about his life, but only gave a year for the marriage, and no place.
I had not researched his family of origin at all, though, and the lengthy article mentioned his father’s name and that his father died in the Civil War the same year he was born. So out of curiosity I checked to confirm (or refute) his father’s service and death, and when I discovered it appeared to be true, I thought I’d check to see if the widow (the husband’s mother) filed for a pension. I confirmed this easily on Ancestry’s pension index cards, and then went to check the other record set of pension index cards, since the two sets often contain different information. Much to my shock, Fold3 turned out to contain the entire pension file – the first time I have found a Civil War pension file on there (they are very slowly indexing them, and were up to 3% complete the last time I checked), though I know a few other researchers who have found several. I ended up very glad that it was on there, as it was by far the smallest Civil War pension file I’ve ever seen, and if I had ordered it from NARA at their flat rate of $75 per pension file for up to 100 pages, it would have cost about $3 per page.
After spending a bit of time skimming through the file, I went back to working on my original goal – when and where the couple married. I found that the husband had published some articles in the trade magazine prior to his sudden death, and that those are online too. I also found in googling that the wife had applied to the Daughters of the American Revolution (DAR), and did a descendant search for her on DAR’s database, hoping the application would include marriage information, as many of them do. I discovered that she applied under a different ancestor than the one I knew served in the Revolutionary War. I paid for and downloaded the PDF of her application, as well as a later application for the same ancestor that would likely be more detailed. This is for a line that I haven’t really done much work on – I’m not stuck on it, I just haven’t done much to date. Her application was bare-bones like many of the early DAR ones, and did not include any marriage information. But the other application was very detailed, and will be useful for clues as I work on this line.
And then I turned back to searching and found a scanned “social register” which listed his marriage to his wife – in 1896, in the city she was from. The article about his life and death had stated that they had married in 1898, and the estimate based on the 1900 census data was for a marriage in 1897. Most interesting of all – at least to me – is that the social register had two different marriage dates listed, one under each of their cross-referenced names! The dates were only two days apart, so at least it gave me a narrow window to focus my initial search.
So I went to FamilySearch, as I knew from other research that they had updated their “Ohio, County Marriages, 1790-1950” database with more records this year, and I figured it was worth a try to see if they had been added. I searched for them, and there they were! One of the two dates in the social register was correct. I was sure I had the right couple, because the husband had a fairly unusual last name and a very unusual middle name.
I had the answer to my question, and new records to add to my files. And I went ahead and stopped by the bank that day to get a money order, and sent the lone marriage record request on its way.
This may seem like a convoluted way to reach my destination. But even if I hadn’t gotten the answer to my question, I still think it would have been a valuable pursuit. Here are some of the things I learned in my two hours of research:
- The death notice states that he died “suddenly.”
- The article on his death provided a very large amount of information I had not already had. While it will need to be confirmed with other records (as shown by the marriage year being incorrect), what has been checked so far has mostly turned out to be accurate.
- Finding the article on his death and the articles he had published in the trade magazine both show that Google Books has added more trade magazines. This is worth pursuing for other folks in my tree as well.
- The trade magazine’s extremely detailed article on his life and death also showed just what a rich source of information they can be, and emphasized that it would be wise to give them more priority in relevant searches.
- Fold3 is continuously adding to their Civil War pension files, and it is worth checking any time a new pensioner is discovered in my research.
- At least for this one widow, the fact that her husband died during the war and she applied nearly immediately appears to have gotten her a pension quite quickly – much different than what I am used to seeing in my Civil War pension research. But she was also dropped from the rolls after some time of failing to collect her pension, according to the last page of the file; this is not something I have encountered before, and plan to explore what it means more.
- The pension file also indicates that he was the only child of this couple.
- The DAR applications suggest a possible path for a line I haven’t done much work on, as well as some sources to try for it. Her application and acceptance also tell me that she was a DAR member, and that she knew enough about her lineage to apply through one of her ancestors.
- It’s always worth trying googling for a research question. (Just a self-reminder of something I already knew, but it’s always nice to have confirmation.)
- It seems worthwhile to try the rest of my names of people who may have married in Ohio, since FamilySearch’s “Ohio, County Marriages, 1790-1950” seems to have expanded so much this year.
- The date and place of the marriage, with a scan of the original record now added to my files.
And in my wanderings through the chipmunk tunnel, I found a cache.
[…] In the past few weeks I have very successfully added several more files to my blog drafts file while not publishing any actual finished posts. So I thought I would provide a bit of an update to a post from last November, “In defense of going down the chipmunk tunnel.” […]